MileageCurve
  1. Home
  2. Ford
  3. Expedition 2007–2017

Ford Expedition 2007–2017 problems by year and mileage

3rd generation · U324 (standard) / U354 (EL extended)

Which year is yours? Tap it to see what breaks on it.

The 2007 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
61,000 mi
Complaints filed
215
Recalls naming this year
2

Most reported on the 2007

  1. Tyres29 reports
  2. Transmission and driveline27 reports
  3. Fuel and propulsion system23 reports

2 recall campaigns name the 2007: Latches/locks/linkages — doors; Fuel system, gasoline — fuel injection system. Not every car in a campaign is affected — check the VIN at NHTSA. Recall repairs are free.

The 2008 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
62,000 mi
Complaints filed
146
Recalls naming this year
3

Most reported on the 2008

  1. Body structure34 reports
  2. Brakes19 reports
  3. Transmission and driveline14 reports

3 recall campaigns name the 2008: Tires — pressure monitoring and regulating systems; Latches/locks/linkages — doors; Air bags — frontal. Not every car in a campaign is affected — check the VIN at NHTSA. Recall repairs are free.

The 2009 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
too few reports to time
Complaints filed
28
Recalls naming this year
1

Most reported on the 2009

  1. Body structure7 reports
  2. Electrical system5 reports
  3. Transmission and driveline4 reports

1 recall campaign names the 2009: Exterior lighting — brake lights. Not every car in a campaign is affected — check the VIN at NHTSA. Recall repairs are free.

The 2010 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
53,000 mi
Complaints filed
58
Recalls naming this year
0

Most reported on the 2010

  1. Electrical system10 reports
  2. Transmission and driveline10 reports
  3. Body structure10 reports

The 2011 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
55,000 mi
Complaints filed
71
Recalls naming this year
0

Most reported on the 2011

  1. Transmission and driveline21 reports
  2. Engine11 reports
  3. Body structure10 reports

The 2012 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
82,000 mi
Complaints filed
118
Recalls naming this year
3

Most reported on the 2012

  1. Transmission and driveline64 reports · median 108,000 mi
  2. Electrical system20 reports
  3. Throttle and speed control18 reports

3 recall campaigns name the 2012: Power train — automatic transmission; Exterior lighting — back up lights; Seats — mid/rear assembly. Not every car in a campaign is affected — check the VIN at NHTSA. Recall repairs are free.

The 2013 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
90,000 mi
Complaints filed
92
Recalls naming this year
0

Most reported on the 2013

  1. Transmission and driveline43 reports
  2. Problems owners could not categorise11 reports
  3. Electrical system10 reports

The 2014 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
90,000 mi
Complaints filed
72
Recalls naming this year
0

At least 40% of the complaints about the 2014 were filed after 2020, and most complaints filed since then carry no odometer reading. The median here rests on the earlier reports and likely understates the mileage these failures happen at.

Most reported on the 2014

  1. Transmission and driveline34 reports
  2. Electrical system13 reports
  3. Engine10 reports

The 2015 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
68,000 mi
Complaints filed
164
Recalls naming this year
3

At least 40% of the complaints about the 2015 were filed after 2020, and most complaints filed since then carry no odometer reading. The median here rests on the earlier reports and likely understates the mileage these failures happen at.

Most reported on the 2015

  1. Electrical system45 reports
  2. Engine31 reports
  3. Transmission and driveline29 reports

3 recall campaigns name the 2015: Back over prevention — sensing system; Visibility — defroster/defogger/hvac system. Not every car in a campaign is affected — check the VIN at NHTSA. Recall repairs are free.

The 2016 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
67,000 mi
Complaints filed
216
Recalls naming this year
3

At least 40% of the complaints about the 2016 were filed after 2020, and most complaints filed since then carry no odometer reading. The median here rests on the earlier reports and likely understates the mileage these failures happen at.

Most reported on the 2016

  1. Engine37 reports
  2. Transmission and driveline36 reports
  3. Brakes35 reports

3 recall campaigns name the 2016: Back over prevention — sensing system; Visibility — defroster/defogger/hvac system; Service brakes, hydraulic — foundation components. Not every car in a campaign is affected — check the VIN at NHTSA. Recall repairs are free.

The 2017 Ford Expedition

Close
Median failure report
77,000 mi
Complaints filed
357
Recalls naming this year
4

At least 40% of the complaints about the 2017 were filed after 2020, and most complaints filed since then carry no odometer reading. The median here rests on the earlier reports and likely understates the mileage these failures happen at.

Most reported on the 2017

  1. Electrical system92 reports · median 88,000 mi
  2. Transmission and driveline51 reports
  3. Brakes43 reports

4 recall campaigns name the 2017: Back over prevention — sensing system; Service brakes, hydraulic — foundation components; Visibility — defroster/defogger/hvac system. Not every car in a campaign is affected — check the VIN at NHTSA. Recall repairs are free.

Each tile shows the median mileage at which that model year’s failures were reported. † marks a year whose median likely understates the mileage: much of its reporting came after 2020, when most complaints stopped recording an odometer reading. The 2013 reports latest and the 2010 earliest, but part of that gap is age: the 2010 has had 3 more years on the road to accumulate mileage. 1 of these years carries fewer than 30 reports with an odometer reading and shows no median at all, rather than one computed from a handful.

The short answer

“Is the 2007–2017 Ford Expedition reliable?”

Median of reported failures
70,000 mi
90% of reports came by
147,000 mi
Reports with mileage
1,014
Recalls
13

At least 40% of this generation’s complaints were filed after 2020, and most complaints filed since then carry no odometer reading, so the median likely understates the mileage these failures happen at.

Most reported

  1. Transmission and driveline21.7% of complaints · median 77,000 mi
  2. Electrical system17.0% of complaints · median 90,000 mi
  3. Engine11.8% of complaints · median 84,000 mi

When each system fails ↓

Documented problems

What each one is ↓

Owners filed 1,537 complaints with NHTSA about the 2007–2017 Ford Expedition; the transmission and driveline leads with 21.7% of them, and half of the 1,014 that record an odometer reading came by 70,000 miles. A count like this can’t rate reliability on its own: NHTSA records what owners chose to report, not how many of each car were sold.

Failures are spread across the mileage range, with the middle half between 36,000 and 108,000 miles.

Before-you-buy checklist ↓At your mileage ↓Check this VIN — NHTSA ↗

How many miles does a 2007–2017 Ford Expedition last?

Complaint records can’t measure how long a car lasts; they show when reported failures happened. On the 2007–2017 Ford Expedition, half of the 1,014 complaints that record an odometer reading were filed by 70,000 miles and 90% by 147,000 miles.

96 reports came in past 150,000 miles and 27 past 200,000 — each one proof that an Expedition reached that mileage, not that it failed there.

Figure 1 · Ford Expedition 2007–2017 · 1,014 reports with mileage

Mileage at failure

Complaints per 10,000-mile bin, 0 to 200,000 miles, equal bins on a linear scale. Tallest bar = 107 complaints.

Mileage at failure, Ford Expedition 2007–2017Histogram of 1,014 owner-reported failures by mileage, in 10,000-mile bins from 0 to 200,000. The tallest bin is 0 to 10,000 miles with 107 complaints, 10.6 percent of the total. Failures are spread across the mileage range, with the middle half between 36,000 and 108,000 miles. A further 27 complaints, 2.7 percent, were reported above 200,000 miles and are shown as a separate detached bar. Median mileage at failure is 70,000.
  • Rest of the range
  • Median
  • 200,000+ — 27 complaints (2.7%), plotted separately
10%
9,042
25%
36,000
Median
70,000
75%
108,000
90%
147,000

Tallest bin: 107 complaints between 0 and 10,000 miles. Based on 1,014 complaints that record mileage. Bin width 10,000 miles.

Show the numbers
Complaints by mileage bin
MileageComplaintsShare
0–10,00010710.6%
10,000–20,000605.9%
20,000–30,000474.6%
30,000–40,000605.9%
40,000–50,000636.2%
50,000–60,000777.6%
60,000–70,000919.0%
70,000–80,000757.4%
80,000–90,000636.2%
90,000–100,000676.6%
100,000–110,000595.8%
110,000–120,000464.5%
120,000–130,000393.8%
130,000–140,000383.7%
140,000–150,000262.6%
150,000–160,000282.8%
160,000–170,000161.6%
170,000–180,000121.2%
180,000–190,00070.7%
190,000–200,00060.6%
200,000+272.7%

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation, public domain. Complaint counts reflect what owners reported and are not a measure of failure rate per vehicle sold.

What this can and cannot tell you: these are complaints owners chose to file, not a failure rate. Popular models accumulate more of them simply by being common. How this is built.

Common Expedition problems, and when they happen

Figure 2 · Ford Expedition 2007–2017

When each system fails

Bar spans the middle half of reports; the notch inside each bar is the median. Miles at failure on a proportional scale — equal distances are equal ratios, not equal miles.

  1. Throttle and speed control121 reports50,00035,000–85,000Throttle and speed control: 121 reports, median 50,000 miles, middle half 35,000 to 85,000 miles.
  2. Brakes134 reports62,00046,000–90,000Brakes: 134 reports, median 62,000 miles, middle half 46,000 to 90,000 miles.
  3. Body structure108 reports63,00040,000–87,000Body structure: 108 reports, median 63,000 miles, middle half 40,000 to 87,000 miles.
  4. Transmission and driveline333 reports77,00036,000–120,000Transmission and driveline: 333 reports, median 77,000 miles, middle half 36,000 to 120,000 miles.
  5. Problems owners could not categorise132 reports79,00026,000–114,000Problems owners could not categorise: 132 reports, median 79,000 miles, middle half 26,000 to 114,000 miles.
  6. Engine181 reports84,00051,000–124,000Engine: 181 reports, median 84,000 miles, middle half 51,000 to 124,000 miles.
  7. Electrical system262 reports90,00051,000–121,000Electrical system: 262 reports, median 90,000 miles, middle half 51,000 to 121,000 miles.
  • Your odometer — appears after you enter it in “Where your car sits”

Ordered by median mileage, earliest first. The first 12,000 miles are shaded: that is the boundary this site uses between a manufacturing defect and ordinary wear, not a property of the world.

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation, public domain.

All systems in a table
Complaints by vehicle system
SystemComplaintsShareMedian25–75%
Transmission and driveline33321.7%77,00036,000–120,000
Electrical system26217.0%90,00051,000–121,000
Engine18111.8%84,00051,000–124,000
Brakes1348.7%62,00046,000–90,000
Problems owners could not categorise1328.6%79,00026,000–114,000
Throttle and speed control1217.9%50,00035,000–85,000
Body structure1087.0%63,00040,000–87,000
Fuel and propulsion system966.2%65,00048,000–98,000
Visibility equipment875.7%94,00060,000–130,000
Hydraulic brake circuit835.4%67,00036,000–104,000
System by system, in words

Complaints about this generation are not spread evenly across the vehicle, and the systems that generate the most of them do not all fail at the same point in a car's life. The median failure across all systems here is 70,000 miles; the figures below show which parts of the car run ahead of that and which run behind.

The transmission and driveline accounts for 21.7% of complaints (333 reports, 218 of them with a mileage figure), with a median of 77,000 miles, close to the vehicle's overall pattern. The middle half of these reports falls between 36,000 and 120,000 miles.

The electrical system accounts for 17.0% of complaints (262 reports, 144 of them with a mileage figure), with a median of 90,000 miles, close to the vehicle's overall pattern. The middle half of these reports falls between 51,000 and 121,000 miles.

The engine accounts for 11.8% of complaints (181 reports, 127 of them with a mileage figure), with a median of 84,000 miles, close to the vehicle's overall pattern. The middle half of these reports falls between 51,000 and 124,000 miles.

The brakes account for 8.7% of complaints (134 reports, 84 of them with a mileage figure), with a median of 62,000 miles, close to the vehicle's overall pattern. The middle half of these reports falls between 46,000 and 90,000 miles.

Problems owners could not categorise accounts for 8.6% of complaints (132 reports, 52 of them with a mileage figure), with a median of 79,000 miles, close to the vehicle's overall pattern. The middle half of these reports falls between 26,000 and 114,000 miles.

Throttle and speed control accounts for 7.9% of complaints (121 reports, 85 of them with a mileage figure), with a median of 50,000 miles, close to the vehicle's overall pattern. The middle half of these reports falls between 35,000 and 85,000 miles.

Known problems with the 2007–2017 Expedition

Engine 2007–2014

5.4L 3V cam phaser rattle and timing chain/tensioner wear — oil starvation to the top end at cold start wears the phasers, producing the characteristic rattle; replacement often does not hold and the common field fix is locking out the variable cam timing.

Engine 2007–2008

Affected: design revised on later 3V heads

5.4L 3V two-piece spark plugs seizing and breaking off in the cylinder head during service.

Engine 2015–2017

3.5L EcoBoost timing chain stretch and cam phaser wear, plus turbocharger and intercooler condensation-related misfires under sustained load.

Suspension

Rear load-leveling air suspension compressor and air spring failure.

Before you buy a 2007–2017 Expedition: the 3-minute check

Generated from 1,014 mileage-tagged complaints, 13 recall campaigns, 4 documented problem areas. Print this page — the checklist survives print.

  1. Run the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls. 13 campaigns cover this generation; an open recall is a free repair you can make the seller's problem.
  2. Check engine on 2007–2014 cars. 5.4L 3V cam phaser rattle and timing chain/tensioner wear — oil starvation to the top end at cold start wears the phasers, producing the characteristic rattle; replacement often does not hold and the common field fix is…
  3. Check engine on 2007–2008 (design revised on later 3V heads) cars. 5.4L 3V two-piece spark plugs seizing and breaking off in the cylinder head during service.
  4. Check engine on 2015–2017 cars. 3.5L EcoBoost timing chain stretch and cam phaser wear, plus turbocharger and intercooler condensation-related misfires under sustained load.
  5. Complaint reports are not spread evenly across model years here — see the by-model-year table below before you settle on a year.
  6. End with a pre-purchase inspection of this car. Aggregate data describes the population; the example in front of you has its own history.

For a buyer, failures on this generation are spread rather than concentrated: the middle half falls between 36,000 and 108,000 miles, with a median of 70,000. There is no single mileage threshold to watch, which means condition and maintenance records are more informative than the odometer.

On inspection, the transmission and driveline and the electrical system are where this generation's reports concentrate, so those are the areas worth a specific look. The transmission and driveline in particular shows a median failure mileage of 77,000, which gives a concrete number to compare against the odometer of any car you are considering.

None of this is a substitute for a pre-purchase inspection on the individual car. Aggregate patterns describe a population; the example in front of you has its own history.

Expedition problems by mileage: where your car sits

Type your odometer reading, or read the common mileages in the table. Your marker lands on the timing chart above and on the curve below.

earlier most reports on that system came below this mileage — ask for repair records. in window this mileage sits inside the middle half of its reports. later most reports came above it. That describes reports, not your odds.

Where each system’s reports sit against common odometer readings
SystemMiddle half of reports, miAt 60k mi41% belowAt 90k mi63% belowAt 120k mi80% belowAt 150k mi91% belowAt 200k mi97% below
Transmission and driveline36,000–120,000in windowin windowearlierearlierearlier
Electrical system51,000–121,000in windowin windowin windowearlierearlier
Engine51,000–124,000in windowin windowin windowearlierearlier
Brakes46,000–90,000in windowearlierearlierearlierearlier
Problems owners could not categorise26,000–114,000in windowin windowearlierearlierearlier
Throttle and speed control35,000–85,000in windowearlierearlierearlierearlier
Body structure40,000–87,000in windowearlierearlierearlierearlier

Figure 3 · Ford Expedition 2007–2017 · 1,014 reports with mileage

Share of reports below each mileage

Share of mileage-tagged reports filed at or below each odometer reading. Steps rise only at bin edges, by exact counted shares.

Cumulative share of reports by mileage, Ford Expedition 2007–2017Of 1,014 reports that record mileage, the share filed below each odometer reading, rising in steps at each 10,000-mile bin edge. 41 percent below 60,000 miles. 63 percent below 90,000 miles. 80 percent below 120,000 miles. 91 percent below 150,000 miles. 97 percent below 200,000 miles. Median 70,000 miles.
  • 60,000 mi — 41% of reports below
  • 90,000 mi — 63% of reports below
  • 120,000 mi — 80% of reports below
  • 150,000 mi — 91% of reports below
  • 200,000 mi — 97% of reports below
  • Median — the staircase crosses the 50% line here
  • Your odometer — appears after you enter it above

The staircase tops out at 97%: the remaining 2.7% of reports (27) came above 200,000 miles.

Nothing is smoothed or interpolated. Linear axis, same as Figure 1.

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation, public domain.

2007–2017 Ford Expedition recalls (13)

NHTSA records 13 recall campaigns covering vehicles in this generation. A recall means the manufacturer or the regulator concluded there was a safety defect or a standard was not met, and that a free remedy is owed to owners — including second and later owners.

The campaigns cluster around the reversing camera and sensors (2), the hydraulic brake circuit (2), the exterior lighting (2). Several campaigns against one area can mean a remedy that did not hold, or separate defects in parts filed under the same heading; the summaries below name each defect.

Recall status is specific to the individual vehicle, not the model. Checking a VIN against NHTSA's lookup is free and takes under a minute, and it is the only way to know whether a particular car has had the work done.

Recall repairs are free at an authorized dealer, for any owner. Summaries below shorten NHTSA’s own wording.

  1. Sep 2025 · 2015–2017 · Back Over PreventionA rearview camera that displays an inverted, distorted, or blank image can reduce the driver’s view behind…

    The defect. Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2015-2019 Lincoln MKC, Mustang, F-350 SD, F-250 SD, F-450 SD, 2015-2017 Lincoln Navigator, Expedition, 2015-2018 Edge, Transit Connect, 2016-2019 F-550 SD, Transit, 2017-2019 Econoline, and 2019 Ranger vehicles.…

    What can happen. A rearview camera that displays an inverted, distorted, or blank image can reduce the driver’s view behind the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

    The free fix. Dealers will inspect and replace the rearview camera as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed January 13, 2026. Ford owners will receive letters in phases, beginning…

    NHTSA campaign 25V-572 (2025-09-03).

  2. Apr 2025 · 2015 · Back Over PreventionA blank or distorted rearview camera image can reduce the driver's view of what is behind the vehicle…

    The defect. Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2015 F-250, F-350, F-450, Expedition, Lincoln Navigator, and MKC vehicles. The rearview camera printed circuit board terminal header connector may be loose or damaged, which can result in a blank or distorted…

    What can happen. A blank or distorted rearview camera image can reduce the driver's view of what is behind the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

    The free fix. Dealers will replace the rearview camera, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed October 16, 2025. Owners may contact Ford Customer Service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford's number for this…

    NHTSA campaign 25V-270 (2025-04-23).

  3. Apr 2025 · 2017 · Service Brakes, HydraulicA brake fluid leak can cause reduced brake function and extend the distance required to stop, increasing the…

    The defect. Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2017-2018 F-150, Expedition, and Lincoln Navigator vehicles. The brake master cylinder may allow brake fluid to leak from the front wheel circuit into the brake booster.

    What can happen. A brake fluid leak can cause reduced brake function and extend the distance required to stop, increasing the risk of a crash.

    The free fix. Dealers will replace the brake master cylinder. If the master cylinder is leaking, the brake booster will also be replaced. Repairs will be performed free of charge. Owner notification letters were…

    NHTSA campaign 25V-236 (2025-04-11).

  4. Aug 2022 · 2015–2017 · VisibilityFront blower motor failure can increase the risk of a vehicle interior fire.

    The defect. Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2015-2017 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator vehicles. The front blower motor located behind the glove box may fail.

    What can happen. Front blower motor failure can increase the risk of a vehicle interior fire.

    The free fix. Dealers will replace the front blower motor assembly, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed August 4, 2023. Remedy parts are expected to become available in the second quarter of…

    NHTSA campaign 22V-648 (2022-08-26).

  5. Mar 2022 · 2016–2017 · Service Brakes, HydraulicA loss of brake fluid may result in a change in brake pedal travel, increased pedal effort and reduced front…

    The defect. Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2016-2017 Ford Expedition, Lincoln Navigator, and 2016-2018 F-150 vehicles equipped with 3.5L Ecoboost engines. The brake master cylinder may allow brake fluid to leak from the front wheel circuit into the brake…

    What can happen. A loss of brake fluid may result in a change in brake pedal travel, increased pedal effort and reduced front brake function, requiring greater effort and distance to stop the vehicle. These…

    The free fix. Dealers will replace the brake master cylinder. If the master cylinder is leaking, the brake booster will also be replaced. Repairs will be performed free of charge. An interim owner notification…

    NHTSA campaign 22V-150 (2022-03-11).

  6. Apr 2016 · 2012 · Power TrainAn unexpected downshift into first gear can cause the vehicle to slow down suddenly without warning and the…

    The defect. Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Ford F-150 trucks, 2012 Ford Expedition, Lincoln Navigator, and Ford Mustang vehicles. The affected vehicles are equipped with an automatic transmission that may unexpectedly downshift to…

    What can happen. An unexpected downshift into first gear can cause the vehicle to slow down suddenly without warning and the rear tires may slide or lock, increasing the risk of a crash.

    The free fix. Ford will notify owners, and dealers will reprogram the powertrain control module with updated software, free of charge. The recall began on September 19, 2016. Owners may contact Ford customer…

    NHTSA campaign 16V-248 (2016-04-27).

  7. May 2012 · 2012 · Exterior LightingIf this condition exists, the transmission may not go into reverse or when the driver pushes the shift lever…

    The defect. Ford is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Ford F-150, 2012 Expedition and Lincoln navigator, and 2012-2013 mustang vehicles, for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard nos. 102, "Transmission shift lever…

    What can happen. If this condition exists, the transmission may not go into reverse or when the driver pushes the shift lever in the reverse “r” position and the vehicle’s transmission does go in reverse, the “r” may…

    The free fix. Ford will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace the trs as necessary, free of charge. The safety recall began on june 11, 2012. Owners may contact Ford motor company customer…

    NHTSA campaign 12V-190 (2012-05-03).

  8. Feb 2012 · 2012 · SeatsIn the event of a crash, the seat head restraint may not provide the required strength, increasing the risk…

    The defect. Ford is recalling certain model year 2012 Expedition and Lincoln navigator vehicles, manufactured from november 19, 2011, through december 2, 2011, for failing to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 202, "Head…

    What can happen. In the event of a crash, the seat head restraint may not provide the required strength, increasing the risk of injury.

    The free fix. Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the head restraints as necessary, free of charge. The safety recall began on february 21, 2012. Owners may contact Ford motor company customer…

    NHTSA campaign 12V-034 (2012-02-02).

  9. Jun 2009 · 2009 · Exterior LightingDelay or loss of brake stoplamp function may increase the risk of a crash.

    The defect. Ford is recalling 1,357 my 2009 Expedition and navigator vehicles for failing to comply with the federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." The brake stop lamp switch may be improperly adjusted. This…

    What can happen. Delay or loss of brake stoplamp function may increase the risk of a crash.

    The free fix. Dealers will adjust the brake stoplamp switch free of charge. The recall began on july 6, 2009. Owners may contact Ford motor company customer relationship center at 1-866-436-7332 or…

    NHTSA campaign 09V-232 (2009-06-24).

  10. Apr 2008 · 2008 · TiresThe TPMS indicator light will not illuminate when a tire pressure is is 25% below the 40 PSI value stated on…

    The defect. Ford is recalling 158 my 2008 Expedition and Lincoln navigator vehicles equipped with a tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) and the limo builders package for failing to conform to the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 138, Z"tire…

    What can happen. The TPMS indicator light will not illuminate when a tire pressure is is 25% below the 40 PSI value stated on the tire placard label occurs.

    The free fix. Dealers will reconfigure the TPMS thresholds to the appropriate pressures. The recall began on april 23, 2008. Owners may contact Ford at 1-800-392-3673.

    NHTSA campaign 08V-166 (2008-04-11).

  11. Feb 2008 · 2007–2008 · Latches/Locks/LinkagesIn the event of a side impact crash, the interior door handle may cause the door latch to open increasing the…

    The defect. Ford is recalling 123,632 my 2007-2008 Expedition and Lincoln navigator vehicles. The door handle housing embossment retaining the bottom of the interior door handle spring on all side doors may fracture during normal customer usage. This can result in…

    What can happen. In the event of a side impact crash, the interior door handle may cause the door latch to open increasing the risk of injury to a vehicle occupant.

    The free fix. Dealers will replace the interior handle spring on all side doors. The recall began on march 5, 2008. Owners may contact Ford at 1-800-392-3673.

    NHTSA campaign 08V-058 (2008-02-05).

  12. Feb 2008 · 2007 · Fuel System, GasolineFuel leakage in the presence of an ignition source could result in a fire.

    The defect. Ford is recalling 57,199 my 2006-2007 e-150, e-250, e-350, and my 2007 Expedition and Lincoln navigator vehicles equipped with 5.4L engines. The fuel rail cross-over hose may contain weak areas. As a result, the hose may crack, which could cause a fuel odor…

    What can happen. Fuel leakage in the presence of an ignition source could result in a fire.

    The free fix. Dealers will replace the fuel rail assembly. The recall began on march 3, 2008. Owners may contact Ford at 1-800-392-3673.

    NHTSA campaign 08V-057 (2008-02-05).

  13. Nov 2007 · 2008 · Air BagsThis condition may prevent the driver air bag from properly deploying and reduce occupant protection in the…

    The defect. Certain vehicles fail to conform to the requirements specified in federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 208, 'Occupant crash protection.' The driver air bag module may not have been properly assembled.

    What can happen. This condition may prevent the driver air bag from properly deploying and reduce occupant protection in the event of a crash.

    The free fix. Dealers will replace your driver air bag module free of charge. The recall began on november 20, 2007. Owners may contact Ford at 1-800-392-3673.

    NHTSA campaign 07V-541 (2007-11-21).

Some of these 13 campaigns also cover Lincoln Navigator 2007–2017 (12 of them): the same campaign number appears in NHTSA’s file against both, which means the same defect and the same free repair.

Crashes, fires and injuries owners reported

What owners reported alongside the failure itself, out of 1,537 complaints against this generation:

Crashes
102 (6.6%)
Fires
37
Injury reports
62
Fatality reports
3

These flags are self-reported by complainants and unverified by NHTSA; one report can carry several flags, so the counts overlap and do not sum to a total. They are not adjusted for how many of these vehicles are on the road. No chart is drawn here on purpose: overlapping counts spanning very different magnitudes cannot be honestly encoded as lengths.

Expedition problems by model year

The 2017 drew the most complaints of this generation, 357, most of them about the electrical system, and the 2009 the fewest, 28. A typical year drew about 118.

That makes the 2017 stand out at roughly 3.0 times a typical year. A count like this follows how many cars of each year were sold and how long they have been on the road as much as how often they failed, so it is not by itself evidence of a worse year; what each year's reports name, in its card and row, is the useful part.

Complaints by model year
YearComplaintsWith mileageMedian milesMost reportedRecalls
200721518661,000Tyres (29)2
200814611762,000Body structure (34)3
20092820under 30 reportsBody structure (7)1
2010584653,000Electrical system (10)0
2011715855,000Transmission and driveline (21)0
20121188582,000Transmission and driveline (64)3
2013926890,000Transmission and driveline (43)0
2014724290,000†Transmission and driveline (34)0
201516410968,000†Electrical system (45)3
201621612867,000†Engine (37)3
201735715577,000†Electrical system (92)4

† At least 40% of this year’s complaints were filed after 2020, and most complaints filed since then carry no odometer reading. Its median rests on the earlier reports and likely understates the mileage these failures happen at.

What Expedition owners reported

The contact owns a 2014 Ford Expedition equipped with Cooper Tires, Tire Line: Discoverer AT, Tire Size: 275/55/R20, DOT Number: UTV11R9 4221. The contact purchased four new tires. The contact called Walmart for assistance. The contact became aware that there were large blisters on the sidewalls of the tires. The tire…

2014 · 163,000 miles · Tyres

The contact owns a 2016 Ford Expedition. The contact stated that while attempting to reverse, the rearview camera became inoperable. The contact stated that the rearview camera would occasionally display a blank screen, while at other times a "Camera Not Available" warning message was displayed. The vehicle was taken…

2016 · 160,000 miles · Reversing camera and sensors

The contact owns a 2017 Ford Expedition. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V572000 (Back Over Prevention); but the dealer advised the contact that the recall repair could not be performed without charging for the repair. The contact stated that while in reverse(R) on several occasions, the…

2017 · 94,000 miles · Reversing camera and sensors

The contact owns a 2016 Ford Expedition. The contact stated that the blower motor functioned intermittently, turning on and off unexpectedly. The contact stated that the A/C functioned as intended during the cooler months but was intermittently inoperable in the warmer months, requiring that the wires that were…

2016 · 120,000 miles · Electrical system

Built from 1,014 NHTSA complaints with mileage · snapshot 2026-09-26 · open data · how it is built

Other Expedition generations

Other full-size SUVs from the same years